Monitor this thread via RSS [?]
 
Author Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 1 post(s)
Nomen Nescio
Nomen Nescio

Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author posting habits View only posts by author
Posted - 2005.08.24 04:36:00 - [1]

Thorax pilots all know, but try to ignore:

  • 8 heavy drones are.... FULL BS SET for 99% of bs pilots. No other medium ship can possibly mount anything close to bs capacity - no noses, megapulses, large smartbombs or rack of cruise launchers.

  • Still thorax has both best gallente cruiser grid AND 5 turrets with appropriate damage bonus

  • Vexor for isntance has ABSOLUTELY no advantage in anything, beeing DEDICATED drone ship

  • Thorax bay is twice of both deimos and brutix while these are better gallente ships with similar role - close hitter.



All non thorax pilots know, but try to ignore that wihtout 8 havies thorax will fall to a crowd of noob ships, because:

  • It can't be possibly set up as intended with med blaster to use bonuses because first it has no grid

  • Second with 1 mwd any approach to blaster range is sure death without full tank with 1600 armor plate, even with it thorax with blasters only wont have any real power to compensate for hits during approach

  • Thorax as a gunboat lucks slots, having 2 slots less the maller, since med hybrids are pain to fit on it using other guns will waste bonus, so there is no point to use med hybrids AND thorax

  • Med guns by the way have so little advantage over frig one both in dps, and in case of blasters range, that practicaly there is no point in med guns at all, since they dont have real role now. Under 20 km frig long range hit good, beyond that its a bs range. And not to mention that med guns track about 10 times worse (!)

  • Cruiser in a combat takes beating from all other ships and can't outrun bs weaponry, yet it is too weak to be real power against multiple smaller ships. In case of thorax drone bay allows to have extreamly rare combination of good firepower vs bs, frig guns vs frigs and practicaly max possible cruiser tank and HP all together. Once drones are gone thorax becomes 10 mil destroyer.



My vote would be to remake thorax as:

  • 8 med drones.

  • 4 med slots

  • MWD bonus to sig penalty, not cap. (i.e. at level 5 cruiser mwd does not increase signature at all). Which is needed for approach, yet make it hard to orbit with mwd on forever

  • 800 grid and probably a bit more cpu



Still i say its a hell of a pvp ship for full insurance and a week of skills.
Nomen Nescio
Nomen Nescio

Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author posting habits View only posts by author
Posted - 2005.08.24 04:36:00 - [2]

Thorax pilots all know, but try to ignore:

  • 8 heavy drones are.... FULL BS SET for 99% of bs pilots. No other medium ship can possibly mount anything close to bs capacity - no noses, megapulses, large smartbombs or rack of cruise launchers.

  • Still thorax has both best gallente cruiser grid AND 5 turrets with appropriate damage bonus

  • Vexor for isntance has ABSOLUTELY no advantage in anything, beeing DEDICATED drone ship

  • Thorax bay is twice of both deimos and brutix while these are better gallente ships with similar role - close hitter.



All non thorax pilots know, but try to ignore that wihtout 8 havies thorax will fall to a crowd of noob ships, because:

  • It can't be possibly set up as intended with med blaster to use bonuses because first it has no grid

  • Second with 1 mwd any approach to blaster range is sure death without full tank with 1600 armor plate, even with it thorax with blasters only wont have any real power to compensate for hits during approach

  • Thorax as a gunboat lucks slots, having 2 slots less the maller, since med hybrids are pain to fit on it using other guns will waste bonus, so there is no point to use med hybrids AND thorax

  • Med guns by the way have so little advantage over frig one both in dps, and in case of blasters range, that practicaly there is no point in med guns at all, since they dont have real role now. Under 20 km frig long range hit good, beyond that its a bs range. And not to mention that med guns track about 10 times worse (!)

  • Cruiser in a combat takes beating from all other ships and can't outrun bs weaponry, yet it is too weak to be real power against multiple smaller ships. In case of thorax drone bay allows to have extreamly rare combination of good firepower vs bs, frig guns vs frigs and practicaly max possible cruiser tank and HP all together. Once drones are gone thorax becomes 10 mil destroyer.



My vote would be to remake thorax as:

  • 8 med drones.

  • 4 med slots

  • MWD bonus to sig penalty, not cap. (i.e. at level 5 cruiser mwd does not increase signature at all). Which is needed for approach, yet make it hard to orbit with mwd on forever

  • 800 grid and probably a bit more cpu



Still i say its a hell of a pvp ship for full insurance and a week of skills.
Nomen Nescio
Nomen Nescio

Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author posting habits View only posts by author
Posted - 2005.08.24 19:18:00 - [3]

Regarding the med guns vs frig guns.


  • There is NO POINT AT ALL to compare light electrons to heavy electrons, because you can fit light NEUTRONS like its nothing, yet heavy ELECTRONS are the only real option to fit thorax with med blaster. And advantage of heavy electotron over light neutons is nowhere near 70%.

  • Second point. Frig guns track about 8-10 times BETTER then med ones, now whoever say that 10 times of tracking is nothing is probably an old school raven pilot

  • Third, traning for tech 2 frig guns is a week. Traning for med tech2 is a month on top of that. Moreover, you can put ANY tech2 frig guns on thorax with same result, but you have to use med hybrids tech2 to use the bonus

  • Last one. There is no point of putting blasters because the problem with thorax is lack of weak spots. Then you have 8 heavy drones, full tank and frig long range guns you can do ANYTHING and do it good. What good will be heavy electonrons II (10 mil in gunnery on top) against 150mm rails if you will get webbed? Exactly. And the your main damage is not the guns, but drones, so you can trade the guns AND bonus to damage for 5x150 rails and be frig eater and bs killer.


Nomen Nescio
Nomen Nescio

Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author posting habits View only posts by author
Posted - 2005.08.24 19:18:00 - [4]

Regarding the med guns vs frig guns.


  • There is NO POINT AT ALL to compare light electrons to heavy electrons, because you can fit light NEUTRONS like its nothing, yet heavy ELECTRONS are the only real option to fit thorax with med blaster. And advantage of heavy electotron over light neutons is nowhere near 70%.

  • Second point. Frig guns track about 8-10 times BETTER then med ones, now whoever say that 10 times of tracking is nothing is probably an old school raven pilot

  • Third, traning for tech 2 frig guns is a week. Traning for med tech2 is a month on top of that. Moreover, you can put ANY tech2 frig guns on thorax with same result, but you have to use med hybrids tech2 to use the bonus

  • Last one. There is no point of putting blasters because the problem with thorax is lack of weak spots. Then you have 8 heavy drones, full tank and frig long range guns you can do ANYTHING and do it good. What good will be heavy electonrons II (10 mil in gunnery on top) against 150mm rails if you will get webbed? Exactly. And the your main damage is not the guns, but drones, so you can trade the guns AND bonus to damage for 5x150 rails and be frig eater and bs killer.


Nomen Nescio
Nomen Nescio

Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author posting habits View only posts by author
Posted - 2005.08.25 15:39:00 - [5]

Talking about drones loss in 0.0, in fact we need complex solution. Now the drone bay is the only parameter which affects the drone power of the ship, and you can't give ppl more drone bay because they wont use it for spare drones, but for bigger ones.

(offtopic here is that heavy drones are best choice, which is not balanced, but anyway)

I think i solution could be a complex system:

  • Ships get drone bay AND a parameter called "Drone Control" which is some N points

  • To contorl 1 light drone in space takes 1 Dron Control point of a ship, med is 5 points, heavy is 10. Numbers for instance

  • Then you can have a ship with drone bay of 300m3, but low Drone Control, so you will MAKE SURE that this ship will be using only light drones.

  • At the same time you can make drone ships with really huge drone bay allowing them to have all range of drones and spares for lost ones, yet it will be completelty separated from the number of drones in a space at a given time

  • You can have a mod whih will give percentage bonus to Drone Control, which will give APPROPRIATE bonus to all ships, because if you have bonus +1 drones per level, like vexor has, its nothing like +1 drones per level for say thorax, because drone bay is in fact the limiting factor, and if its not, +1 drone will always be the "+1 heavy one".

  • If you have a lot of drone space but limited Drone Contorol you can in fact make drones VERY different, and drone useds wont whine "heavy drones can't hit moon now", because they will have option to have different sets of drones in a bay. Now 99% of the time drone bays are fitted with one biggest set of drones that fit



just a thought
Nomen Nescio
Nomen Nescio

Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author posting habits View only posts by author
Posted - 2005.08.25 15:39:00 - [6]

Talking about drones loss in 0.0, in fact we need complex solution. Now the drone bay is the only parameter which affects the drone power of the ship, and you can't give ppl more drone bay because they wont use it for spare drones, but for bigger ones.

(offtopic here is that heavy drones are best choice, which is not balanced, but anyway)

I think i solution could be a complex system:

  • Ships get drone bay AND a parameter called "Drone Control" which is some N points

  • To contorl 1 light drone in space takes 1 Dron Control point of a ship, med is 5 points, heavy is 10. Numbers for instance

  • Then you can have a ship with drone bay of 300m3, but low Drone Control, so you will MAKE SURE that this ship will be using only light drones.

  • At the same time you can make drone ships with really huge drone bay allowing them to have all range of drones and spares for lost ones, yet it will be completelty separated from the number of drones in a space at a given time

  • You can have a mod whih will give percentage bonus to Drone Control, which will give APPROPRIATE bonus to all ships, because if you have bonus +1 drones per level, like vexor has, its nothing like +1 drones per level for say thorax, because drone bay is in fact the limiting factor, and if its not, +1 drone will always be the "+1 heavy one".

  • If you have a lot of drone space but limited Drone Contorol you can in fact make drones VERY different, and drone useds wont whine "heavy drones can't hit moon now", because they will have option to have different sets of drones in a bay. Now 99% of the time drone bays are fitted with one biggest set of drones that fit



just a thought
Nomen Nescio
Nomen Nescio

Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author posting habits View only posts by author
Posted - 2005.08.25 15:41:00 - [7]

Edited by: Nomen Nescio on 25/08/2005 15:41:37

Nomen Nescio
Nomen Nescio

Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author posting habits View only posts by author
Posted - 2005.08.25 15:41:00 - [8]

Edited by: Nomen Nescio on 25/08/2005 15:41:37

Nomen Nescio
Nomen Nescio

Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author posting habits View only posts by author
Posted - 2005.08.25 18:48:00 - [9]

Yeah, sure, and caracal at 100 km outdamages us all, how much damage would that be if you go close on it with 300m/s?

170 dps in heavy drones moves 800m/s. And once in range it doesnt stop for reload, how about that?
Nomen Nescio
Nomen Nescio

Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author posting habits View only posts by author
Posted - 2005.08.25 18:48:00 - [10]

Yeah, sure, and caracal at 100 km outdamages us all, how much damage would that be if you go close on it with 300m/s?

170 dps in heavy drones moves 800m/s. And once in range it doesnt stop for reload, how about that?
Nomen Nescio
Nomen Nescio

Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author posting habits View only posts by author
Posted - 2005.08.25 19:08:00 - [11]

For the love of god. Please.

Thorax are usign 150mm rails and hits you at 20km. Rupture has autos and close on thorax.


  • How much damage will thorax deal with 5x150 II before rupture gets in the range of autos?

  • Does thorax have 5 times of armor, while rupture is in gang setup?

  • And we are talking about very very very common thorax setup here and 20 km range, right? :)


Nomen Nescio
Nomen Nescio

Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author posting habits View only posts by author
Posted - 2005.08.25 19:08:00 - [12]

For the love of god. Please.

Thorax are usign 150mm rails and hits you at 20km. Rupture has autos and close on thorax.


  • How much damage will thorax deal with 5x150 II before rupture gets in the range of autos?

  • Does thorax have 5 times of armor, while rupture is in gang setup?

  • And we are talking about very very very common thorax setup here and 20 km range, right? :)


Nomen Nescio
Nomen Nescio

Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author posting habits View only posts by author
Posted - 2005.08.25 20:42:00 - [13]

Edited by: Nomen Nescio on 25/08/2005 20:42:52
Rack of 750 is a deadweight because they take all possible grid, have low dps compared to other med guns and can't track a moon.

Rupture with 750s will be dead to ceptor, af, you name it. While still wont be able to engage bs properly due to tracking at close ranges and bs fire at long ranges.

On the other hand standard thorax is able to engage anytyhing fast and small with best frig long range guns, can attack anyhing bigger and slower with drones for dps close to full rupture gun rack, have 4-5 times of rupture armor and mwd to with a bonus to cap for dictating distance.

Yes you can take out thorax with a specific setup, but its not a SISI BF1, you can fly a ship which can be good against anything or good again 1 cruiser. What your choice would be?
Nomen Nescio
Nomen Nescio

Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author posting habits View only posts by author
Posted - 2005.08.25 20:42:00 - [14]

Edited by: Nomen Nescio on 25/08/2005 20:42:52
Rack of 750 is a deadweight because they take all possible grid, have low dps compared to other med guns and can't track a moon.

Rupture with 750s will be dead to ceptor, af, you name it. While still wont be able to engage bs properly due to tracking at close ranges and bs fire at long ranges.

On the other hand standard thorax is able to engage anytyhing fast and small with best frig long range guns, can attack anyhing bigger and slower with drones for dps close to full rupture gun rack, have 4-5 times of rupture armor and mwd to with a bonus to cap for dictating distance.

Yes you can take out thorax with a specific setup, but its not a SISI BF1, you can fly a ship which can be good against anything or good again 1 cruiser. What your choice would be?
Nomen Nescio
Nomen Nescio

Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author posting habits View only posts by author
Posted - 2005.08.25 20:51:00 - [15]

Originally by: Hephaesteus
I didn't read all the thread, but arn't Gallente supposed to use drones as their thing!!!

And as for a rax taking out a bs. Only if the bs pilot is hopeless.


Seems like I also have the scientific evidence that some people can write but cannot read.
Nomen Nescio
Nomen Nescio

Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author posting habits View only posts by author
Posted - 2005.08.25 20:51:00 - [16]

Originally by: Hephaesteus
I didn't read all the thread, but arn't Gallente supposed to use drones as their thing!!!

And as for a rax taking out a bs. Only if the bs pilot is hopeless.


Seems like I also have the scientific evidence that some people can write but cannot read.
Nomen Nescio
Nomen Nescio

Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author posting habits View only posts by author
Posted - 2005.08.25 23:11:00 - [17]

Edited by: Nomen Nescio on 25/08/2005 23:11:05
Originally by: Garreck

Wrong.The heart of my argument actually just took place when somebody mentioned that they can get 200dps with their rupture. My point is that the rupture (and any other cruiser) can begin doing that damage immediately.



Man you can't be that s....

Rupture fits for damage and get 200 dps "instant" damage, and that' it.

Thorax with NOTHING fitted has 170dps. And 5 guns on top of that. How could you not understand it?!! Thorax fittted the way rupture is will do 200 dps at the ranges of rupture with no problem. PLUS the drones.

PLUS THE DRONES is the problem, not a thorax as a ship. What else can you say to make it clear?
Nomen Nescio
Nomen Nescio

Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author posting habits View only posts by author
Posted - 2005.08.25 23:11:00 - [18]

Edited by: Nomen Nescio on 25/08/2005 23:11:05
Originally by: Garreck

Wrong.The heart of my argument actually just took place when somebody mentioned that they can get 200dps with their rupture. My point is that the rupture (and any other cruiser) can begin doing that damage immediately.



Man you can't be that s....

Rupture fits for damage and get 200 dps "instant" damage, and that' it.

Thorax with NOTHING fitted has 170dps. And 5 guns on top of that. How could you not understand it?!! Thorax fittted the way rupture is will do 200 dps at the ranges of rupture with no problem. PLUS the drones.

PLUS THE DRONES is the problem, not a thorax as a ship. What else can you say to make it clear?
Nomen Nescio
Nomen Nescio

Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author posting habits View only posts by author
Posted - 2005.08.25 23:56:00 - [19]

Shocked So now suddenly 5x250mm rails and 5% damage bonus are somehow not enough to match the rupture 4x720s +5% rof +%5 damage? At 20km range? Thats kinda news for me. And its like what? 10% of a rupture firepower? 25% maybe? Because even HALF of drones dps will be around 100dps, so i think if you outgun poor rax with 200 dps TOTAL, then I have to have like 50 dps on my rails or something?


Nomen Nescio
Nomen Nescio

Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author posting habits View only posts by author
Posted - 2005.08.25 23:56:00 - [20]

Shocked So now suddenly 5x250mm rails and 5% damage bonus are somehow not enough to match the rupture 4x720s +5% rof +%5 damage? At 20km range? Thats kinda news for me. And its like what? 10% of a rupture firepower? 25% maybe? Because even HALF of drones dps will be around 100dps, so i think if you outgun poor rax with 200 dps TOTAL, then I have to have like 50 dps on my rails or something?


Nomen Nescio
Nomen Nescio

Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author posting habits View only posts by author
Posted - 2005.08.26 01:57:00 - [21]

Now you are outcaping thorax? Laughing Sure, hold its fire for just 6 minutes and the guns out of cap? LOL

Having 50 dps for 100 seconds will deal 5k damage on your rupture. For sake of argument thorax has only 1/2 of cap already which is 500 before any skills. Using 10 cap per second with no recharge at all you can fire for 50 seconds which is 2.5k damage....

50 dps I can shoot irons from fig guns, please man, dont be silly on public. 6 minutes... in 6 minutes a velator will kill you.


Nomen Nescio
Nomen Nescio

Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author posting habits View only posts by author
Posted - 2005.08.26 01:57:00 - [22]

Now you are outcaping thorax? Laughing Sure, hold its fire for just 6 minutes and the guns out of cap? LOL

Having 50 dps for 100 seconds will deal 5k damage on your rupture. For sake of argument thorax has only 1/2 of cap already which is 500 before any skills. Using 10 cap per second with no recharge at all you can fire for 50 seconds which is 2.5k damage....

50 dps I can shoot irons from fig guns, please man, dont be silly on public. 6 minutes... in 6 minutes a velator will kill you.


Nomen Nescio
Nomen Nescio

Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author posting habits View only posts by author
Posted - 2005.08.26 02:44:00 - [23]

Man, you just can't admit the obvious.

Thorax at any given fitting or situation has EXTRA weapon which doubles the dps

It can fit 200mm and avoid fitting problems, it can fit just 150mm II and be very good AT EVERYING, any enemy any situation.

What can your rupture do?

Close range you can't track, long range bs will own you. Ceptors comes, you r dead, bs comes you dont have tank, pathetic HP, still low dps total. You dont have any real options to fit because you need your gun bonuses badly. Thorax can fit anything, med blasters, frig blasters, frig rails, frig med beams, med rails... noses for crying out loud. I mean you can fit dozens of setup and be good because you always have your main weapon - drones.

Thorax outdamages deimos. Can you imagine rupture outdamaging munin AT ANY SETUP or skills?

There is no point to argue about it. Thorax is not a vexor to count drones vs other cruiser guns, its a best gallente gunship, best slots, best fitting PLUS full set of bs weapon - heavy drones. If you still can't comprehend it, its like a rupture and a vexor with it under one command.
Nomen Nescio
Nomen Nescio

Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author posting habits View only posts by author
Posted - 2005.08.26 02:44:00 - [24]

Man, you just can't admit the obvious.

Thorax at any given fitting or situation has EXTRA weapon which doubles the dps

It can fit 200mm and avoid fitting problems, it can fit just 150mm II and be very good AT EVERYING, any enemy any situation.

What can your rupture do?

Close range you can't track, long range bs will own you. Ceptors comes, you r dead, bs comes you dont have tank, pathetic HP, still low dps total. You dont have any real options to fit because you need your gun bonuses badly. Thorax can fit anything, med blasters, frig blasters, frig rails, frig med beams, med rails... noses for crying out loud. I mean you can fit dozens of setup and be good because you always have your main weapon - drones.

Thorax outdamages deimos. Can you imagine rupture outdamaging munin AT ANY SETUP or skills?

There is no point to argue about it. Thorax is not a vexor to count drones vs other cruiser guns, its a best gallente gunship, best slots, best fitting PLUS full set of bs weapon - heavy drones. If you still can't comprehend it, its like a rupture and a vexor with it under one command.
Nomen Nescio
Nomen Nescio

Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author posting habits View only posts by author
Posted - 2005.08.26 03:11:00 - [25]

If you can understand that 1+1 is > then 1, then i duno.

Thorax has similar fitting, bonus to damage and slots as rupture. 250 mm rails are decent long range cruiser guns. They fit hard. but 720s fit hard 2. 200mm rails still have good range, use bonus, fit better, 650s same.

5 + 1 bonus is = as 4 + 2 bonuses. 720s norm damage is 0.36, 200mm norm is 0.41, which is outdamaging for 14% for rails. 5x200mm fit, have 18km opt, 10km fall = ability to engage at 20-30km. How is rupture ANY really that better? All depends on pilots and situation.

BUT on top of that thorax has 170 dps, which can DOUBLE the damage at close range. Can rupture fit 8 autos for close range? No it cant.

Thorax can go for full tank. Still having close range damage of comparable with rupture. Thorax can fit small guns and be able to have both close range damage and ability to blow up small target like nothing. Can rupture fit 4 vulcans and 4 280s at the same time? No. Can rupture fit ANYTHING but med projectiles? No, because wihtout 2 bonuses to guns its nothing. Can thorax fight and win with only drones - yes it can? What we will have EXTRA? Full slots and fitting for ANYTHING.

You dont really get it, do you?


Nomen Nescio
Nomen Nescio

Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author posting habits View only posts by author
Posted - 2005.08.26 03:11:00 - [26]

If you can understand that 1+1 is > then 1, then i duno.

Thorax has similar fitting, bonus to damage and slots as rupture. 250 mm rails are decent long range cruiser guns. They fit hard. but 720s fit hard 2. 200mm rails still have good range, use bonus, fit better, 650s same.

5 + 1 bonus is = as 4 + 2 bonuses. 720s norm damage is 0.36, 200mm norm is 0.41, which is outdamaging for 14% for rails. 5x200mm fit, have 18km opt, 10km fall = ability to engage at 20-30km. How is rupture ANY really that better? All depends on pilots and situation.

BUT on top of that thorax has 170 dps, which can DOUBLE the damage at close range. Can rupture fit 8 autos for close range? No it cant.

Thorax can go for full tank. Still having close range damage of comparable with rupture. Thorax can fit small guns and be able to have both close range damage and ability to blow up small target like nothing. Can rupture fit 4 vulcans and 4 280s at the same time? No. Can rupture fit ANYTHING but med projectiles? No, because wihtout 2 bonuses to guns its nothing. Can thorax fight and win with only drones - yes it can? What we will have EXTRA? Full slots and fitting for ANYTHING.

You dont really get it, do you?


Nomen Nescio
Nomen Nescio

Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author posting habits View only posts by author
Posted - 2005.08.26 14:30:00 - [27]

If you nerf the 1600 plates it will be even worse:


  • All cruisers and most hacs will lose ability to go for HP tank (I assume large shield ext are nerfed witht the plates). Which will practicaly cut the number of setups in half

  • All cruisers wont fit frig guns, because they have unused grid and low HP, so they will always fit med guns. What we know about med guns? That they are not good. They can't hit small targets, they have very limited range for close combat and at long range bs totaly owns in a gunfight. Yet med guns take so much grid that if you go with them cruiser has nothing left to play with

  • Cruisers wont be able to take hits, because cruiser active tanking sucks. So the only cruiser setup will be gank.

  • Cruiser which is fitted with med guns, has no tanking worth very little. Frig size will orbit and laugh, if ceptor engages it will blow up such cruiser before taking any damage if any, because you can dive under med guns tracking way before it locks you. And remember that med guns have 10 times less tracking. 10 times.

  • BS will be able to take out low HP cruiser in a volley at ranges beyond med guns, at close ranges it will take only 1 web to hit the cruiser with large guns. And in a world of fast lock bs like we have now cruisers will suck vs bs.



My point is that cruisers fit bs extenders and plates because its the only way to be usable. Both because med guns give no advantages taking all fitting and native HP with the cruiser active tanking in most situations is not enough to do anything but ganking before you take any fire, because if you do, no matter who shoots you you are dead.




Nomen Nescio
Nomen Nescio

Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author posting habits View only posts by author
Posted - 2005.08.26 14:30:00 - [28]

If you nerf the 1600 plates it will be even worse:


  • All cruisers and most hacs will lose ability to go for HP tank (I assume large shield ext are nerfed witht the plates). Which will practicaly cut the number of setups in half

  • All cruisers wont fit frig guns, because they have unused grid and low HP, so they will always fit med guns. What we know about med guns? That they are not good. They can't hit small targets, they have very limited range for close combat and at long range bs totaly owns in a gunfight. Yet med guns take so much grid that if you go with them cruiser has nothing left to play with

  • Cruisers wont be able to take hits, because cruiser active tanking sucks. So the only cruiser setup will be gank.

  • Cruiser which is fitted with med guns, has no tanking worth very little. Frig size will orbit and laugh, if ceptor engages it will blow up such cruiser before taking any damage if any, because you can dive under med guns tracking way before it locks you. And remember that med guns have 10 times less tracking. 10 times.

  • BS will be able to take out low HP cruiser in a volley at ranges beyond med guns, at close ranges it will take only 1 web to hit the cruiser with large guns. And in a world of fast lock bs like we have now cruisers will suck vs bs.



My point is that cruisers fit bs extenders and plates because its the only way to be usable. Both because med guns give no advantages taking all fitting and native HP with the cruiser active tanking in most situations is not enough to do anything but ganking before you take any fire, because if you do, no matter who shoots you you are dead.




Nomen Nescio
Nomen Nescio

Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author posting habits View only posts by author
Posted - 2005.08.26 14:36:00 - [29]

PS
About firing on drones to fight rax. Yeah sure, take your time. But if you fire with guns on drones keep in mind that 8x450 HP of a drones is 3600 HP. Drones are small and fast hard to hit, hard to lock due to a lot of clicking. At the same time, thorax itself can do with guns half of the total damage. So what you gonna do? Provide 3.5k damage on thorax or try to shoot down drones?

The problem is that med smb is totaly sucks against heavy drones. Obviously because heavy drones are designed to be bs weapon and large smb to be conter weapon against it. Med smb is designed against med drones, but who uses med drones then heavies can hit most of the targets and provide more damage having MORE HP.

PS
And what they did with the ecm burst? What the hell they did that for?
Nomen Nescio
Nomen Nescio

Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author posting habits View only posts by author
Posted - 2005.08.26 14:36:00 - [30]

Edited by: Nomen Nescio on 26/08/2005 14:38:08
PS
About firing on drones to fight rax. Yeah sure, take your time. But if you fire with guns on drones keep in mind that 8x450 HP of a drones is 3600 HP. Drones are small and fast hard to hit, hard to lock due to a lot of clicking. At the same time, thorax itself can do with guns half of the total damage. So what you gonna do? Provide 3.5k damage on thorax or try to shoot down drones?

The problem is that med smb totaly sucks against heavy drones. Obviously because heavy drones are designed to be bs weapon and large smb to be conter weapon against them. Med smb is designed against med drones, but who uses med drones then heavies can hit most of the targets and provide more damage having MORE HP.

PS
And what they did with the ecm burst? What the hell they did that for?
Nomen Nescio
Nomen Nescio

Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author posting habits View only posts by author
Posted - 2005.08.26 18:18:00 - [31]

Now they will say that if you fit 3 smb and 3 noses you can kill drones fast, which somehow means "dead thorax", LOL
Nomen Nescio
Nomen Nescio

Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author posting habits View only posts by author
Posted - 2005.08.26 18:18:00 - [32]

Now they will say that if you fit 3 smb and 3 noses you can kill drones fast, which somehow means "dead thorax", LOL
Nomen Nescio
Nomen Nescio

Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author posting habits View only posts by author
Posted - 2005.08.26 18:32:00 - [33]

Tomorrow there is no plates in the game.

  • Thorax has 5 guns, grid to fit, bonus to damage. Some HP.

  • Rupture has 4 guns 2 bonuses, grid to fit, Some HP which is not much bigger then thorax HP.

  • All the stas can float aroudn 10%-15% to the advantage of one or another

  • AND THORAX GETS DOUBLE DPS AND A COMPLETE SET BS WEAPON ON TOP OF THAT



How on gods green earth it is balanced? How plates fit here?

Nomen Nescio
Nomen Nescio

Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author posting habits View only posts by author
Posted - 2005.08.26 18:32:00 - [34]

Tomorrow there is no plates in the game.

  • Thorax has 5 guns, grid to fit, bonus to damage. Some HP.

  • Rupture has 4 guns 2 bonuses, grid to fit, Some HP which is not much bigger then thorax HP.

  • All the stas can float aroudn 10%-15% to the advantage of one or another

  • AND THORAX GETS DOUBLE DPS AND A COMPLETE SET BS WEAPON ON TOP OF THAT



How on gods green earth it is balanced? How plates fit here?

Nomen Nescio
Nomen Nescio

Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author posting habits View only posts by author
Posted - 2005.08.26 18:52:00 - [35]

Edited by: Nomen Nescio on 26/08/2005 18:55:04

  • Are heavy drones a weapon? Yes

  • Are heavy drones a closerange weapon? Yes

  • Are 8 heavy drones a closerange weapon compared to set of med close range guns? Yes

  • Can thorax fit long range guns together with drones? Yes

  • Can thorax use these guns close to the stats of other cruiser with long range guns? Yes

  • Will long range guns and drones of thorax be equal of 5 long range + 4 short range guns setup? Yes

  • In case of short range guns and drones will it be equal of 8-10 short range guns? Yes

  • Can ANY OTHER CRUISER fit 5 long range + 4 short range guns at the same time? NO

  • Can ANY OTHER CRUISER fit 8-10 short range guns? NO

  • Does thorax have half of other cruisers HP, cap or tanking? NO

  • Does thorax have half speed or anything that really prevents it from using extra short range weapon? NO

  • Does all of above means that thorax is a cruiser like any other with a DOUBLE of offence power? Yes



Nomen Nescio
Nomen Nescio

Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author posting habits View only posts by author
Posted - 2005.08.26 18:52:00 - [36]

Edited by: Nomen Nescio on 26/08/2005 18:55:04

  • Are heavy drones a weapon? Yes

  • Are heavy drones a closerange weapon? Yes

  • Are 8 heavy drones a closerange weapon compared to set of med close range guns? Yes

  • Can thorax fit long range guns together with drones? Yes

  • Can thorax use these guns close to the stats of other cruiser with long range guns? Yes

  • Will long range guns and drones of thorax be equal of 5 long range + 4 short range guns setup? Yes

  • In case of short range guns and drones will it be equal of 8-10 short range guns? Yes

  • Can ANY OTHER CRUISER fit 5 long range + 4 short range guns at the same time? NO

  • Can ANY OTHER CRUISER fit 8-10 short range guns? NO

  • Does thorax have half of other cruisers HP, cap or tanking? NO

  • Does thorax have half speed or anything that really prevents it from using extra short range weapon? NO

  • Does all of above means that thorax is a cruiser like any other with a DOUBLE of offence power? Yes



Nomen Nescio
Nomen Nescio

Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author posting habits View only posts by author
Posted - 2005.08.26 19:23:00 - [37]

Originally by: Garreck
Originally by: Nomen Nescio
  • Can thorax use these guns close to the stats of other cruiser with long range guns? Yes



  • Thorax sacrifices more grid and low slots to fit said weapons, allowing other long range setups (namely the rupture) to fit damage or tracking mods...maybe both...somebody check me on that? Anyway...thorax is distinctly at a disadvantage at long range.



    Prosecution asks for prove of the thorax long range abilities vs rupture!


    • 200mm rail: norm 0.41, optimal 18km, falloff 10km, 180 grid

    • 720s how: norm 0.36, optimal 20km, falloff 17.5km, 250 grid

    • Fitting 5x200mm = 900 grid, 4x720 = 1000

    • Damage: base advantage for rail is 13%. Advantage of 5 guns vs 4 is 25%. With 1st bonus the same for both ships, second rupture bonus will NEGATE advantage of 5 guns only at level 4, at max skill level rupture gets 5% bonus rof. With 13% base rail dps advantage. AT LEVEL 5 RUPTURE STILL HAS STILL LOWER NORM DPS for guns

    • Tracking is the same



    You honor and members of the jury, can we say that rupture outdamages or outranges thorax a lot? Like half maybe? No? Like 40%? Still no? In what cases rupture will have advantage over thorax? At extream cruiser fight ranges only. How big of the advantage? Slim.

    Prosecution rests.
    Nomen Nescio
    Nomen Nescio

    Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author posting habits View only posts by author
    Posted - 2005.08.26 19:23:00 - [38]

    Originally by: Garreck
    Originally by: Nomen Nescio
  • Can thorax use these guns close to the stats of other cruiser with long range guns? Yes



  • Thorax sacrifices more grid and low slots to fit said weapons, allowing other long range setups (namely the rupture) to fit damage or tracking mods...maybe both...somebody check me on that? Anyway...thorax is distinctly at a disadvantage at long range.



    Prosecution asks for prove of the thorax long range abilities vs rupture!


    • 200mm rail: norm 0.41, optimal 18km, falloff 10km, 180 grid

    • 720s how: norm 0.36, optimal 20km, falloff 17.5km, 250 grid

    • Fitting 5x200mm = 900 grid, 4x720 = 1000

    • Damage: base advantage for rail is 13%. Advantage of 5 guns vs 4 is 25%. With 1st bonus the same for both ships, second rupture bonus will NEGATE advantage of 5 guns only at level 4, at max skill level rupture gets 5% bonus rof. With 13% base rail dps advantage. AT LEVEL 5 RUPTURE STILL HAS STILL LOWER NORM DPS for guns

    • Tracking is the same



    You honor and members of the jury, can we say that rupture outdamages or outranges thorax a lot? Like half maybe? No? Like 40%? Still no? In what cases rupture will have advantage over thorax? At extream cruiser fight ranges only. How big of the advantage? Slim.

    Prosecution rests.
    Nomen Nescio
    Nomen Nescio

    Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author posting habits View only posts by author
    Posted - 2005.08.26 19:32:00 - [39]

    Objection, defence is playing fool with the court!

    200 mm is WEAKER rail, but still its better. Defence knows that and tries to dismiss the witness.

    250mm rail have more damage and range. They will only be better, but harder to fit. Why bother if 200mm rail shows us the setup which fits, works and totaly shows the disbalance of thorax bay.
    Nomen Nescio
    Nomen Nescio

    Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author posting habits View only posts by author
    Posted - 2005.08.26 19:32:00 - [40]

    Objection, defence is playing fool with the court!

    200 mm is WEAKER rail, but still its better. Defence knows that and tries to dismiss the witness.

    250mm rail have more damage and range. They will only be better, but harder to fit. Why bother if 200mm rail shows us the setup which fits, works and totaly shows the disbalance of thorax bay.
    Nomen Nescio
    Nomen Nescio

    Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author posting habits View only posts by author
    Posted - 2005.08.26 19:51:00 - [41]

    Originally by: Toshiro Khan

    Objection over ruled... 200mms should be compaired to 650s. compairing the 720 to the 200mm and using its fittings as the basis of your argument is showing the court you don't know what your talking about.



    Prosecution is friking speachless! But calls another witness.


    • 650mm art: norm 0.31, optimal 16km, falloff 17.5km, 200 grid

    • 200mm rail: norm 0.41, optimal 18km, falloff 10km, 180 grid

    • Fitting 5x200mm = 900 grid, 4x650 = 800 grid

    • Damage: base advantage for rail is 32% !!!! Instead of 13% for hows. Defence is gotta be kidding. 32% of dps for 200 grid difference between 720s setup. If defence is so stuburn 650s it is.



    Prosecution never said fitting is the problem! The point is that thorax is capable of engaing at mid and long ranges with stats comparable with rupture.

    Rupture has NO real ADVANTAGE to allow thorax to have double offence at close range. What the hell are you talking about ppl?
    Nomen Nescio
    Nomen Nescio

    Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author posting habits View only posts by author
    Posted - 2005.08.26 19:51:00 - [42]

    Originally by: Toshiro Khan

    Objection over ruled... 200mms should be compaired to 650s. compairing the 720 to the 200mm and using its fittings as the basis of your argument is showing the court you don't know what your talking about.



    Prosecution is friking speachless! But calls another witness.


    • 650mm art: norm 0.31, optimal 16km, falloff 17.5km, 200 grid

    • 200mm rail: norm 0.41, optimal 18km, falloff 10km, 180 grid

    • Fitting 5x200mm = 900 grid, 4x650 = 800 grid

    • Damage: base advantage for rail is 32% !!!! Instead of 13% for hows. Defence is gotta be kidding. 32% of dps for 200 grid difference between 720s setup. If defence is so stuburn 650s it is.



    Prosecution never said fitting is the problem! The point is that thorax is capable of engaing at mid and long ranges with stats comparable with rupture.

    Rupture has NO real ADVANTAGE to allow thorax to have double offence at close range. What the hell are you talking about ppl?
    Nomen Nescio
    Nomen Nescio

    Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author posting habits View only posts by author
    Posted - 2005.08.26 20:04:00 - [43]

    Edited by: Nomen Nescio on 26/08/2005 20:06:38

    Ppl dont fit rails because no1 needs a cruiser gunfight at 40km. Thats all. Rupture fits 720s because they can do nothing else.

    Whats your dps on 2 heavy launchers? And how is it better then 170dps close range?

    It feels like you are a thorax pilot fearing for your drone bay.

    PS

    Sacrifice yeh? And your rupture is not secrifizing everything it can just to compete with rails? What kind of argument is that? You can fit guns, I can fit guns, ranges are close, trackign same, damage is the same. You can't fit antyhing else, I can't also. HP same, how is it any better to use rupture then thorax for long range?

    Nomen Nescio
    Nomen Nescio

    Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author posting habits View only posts by author
    Posted - 2005.08.26 20:04:00 - [44]

    Edited by: Nomen Nescio on 26/08/2005 20:06:38

    Ppl dont fit rails because no1 needs a cruiser gunfight at 40km. Thats all. Rupture fits 720s because they can do nothing else.

    Whats your dps on 2 heavy launchers? And how is it better then 170dps close range?

    It feels like you are a thorax pilot fearing for your drone bay.

    PS

    Sacrifice yeh? And your rupture is not secrifizing everything it can just to compete with rails? What kind of argument is that? You can fit guns, I can fit guns, ranges are close, trackign same, damage is the same. You can't fit antyhing else, I can't also. HP same, how is it any better to use rupture then thorax for long range?

    Nomen Nescio
    Nomen Nescio

    Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author posting habits View only posts by author
    Posted - 2005.08.26 20:10:00 - [45]

    Then you dissmiss any logic and say "rupture is better long range" every time I can't argue much but "you are thorax pilot".

    Show me numbers where we all can see that rupture is twice better then thorax long range, because thorax is TWICE BETTER the rupture close range.

    I show you numbers - they both can be fitted for long range and perform WELL. But you fitted for long range can't do anything else, thorax can own both close and long range. What else can I say?
    Nomen Nescio
    Nomen Nescio

    Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author posting habits View only posts by author
    Posted - 2005.08.26 20:10:00 - [46]

    Then you dissmiss any logic and say "rupture is better long range" every time I can't argue much but "you are thorax pilot".

    Show me numbers where we all can see that rupture is twice better then thorax long range, because thorax is TWICE BETTER the rupture close range.

    I show you numbers - they both can be fitted for long range and perform WELL. But you fitted for long range can't do anything else, thorax can own both close and long range. What else can I say?
    Nomen Nescio
    Nomen Nescio

    Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author posting habits View only posts by author
    Posted - 2005.08.26 20:22:00 - [47]

    Dont play stupid. Show me the numbers how long range thorax is twice weaker then long range rupture.

    Points is that you claim it is, and I say its not.
    Nomen Nescio
    Nomen Nescio

    Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author posting habits View only posts by author
    Posted - 2005.08.26 20:22:00 - [48]

    Dont play stupid. Show me the numbers how long range thorax is twice weaker then long range rupture.

    Points is that you claim it is, and I say its not.
    Nomen Nescio
    Nomen Nescio

    Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author posting habits View only posts by author
    Posted - 2005.08.26 20:37:00 - [49]

    Edited by: Nomen Nescio on 26/08/2005 20:37:39
    So with no arguments from the tother side, we all agree that thorax fittgin with rails is as good as rupture then?

    Ok, so why would thorax need more drones then rupture? Argument about approach is totaly useless. I can say that rupture fitted with ac and thorax is with rails, and count how much damage i'll do with rails before rupture catches up.

    Once again

    • Rupture and thorax are good long range

    • Why thorax has more drones then rupture for close range?


    Nomen Nescio
    Nomen Nescio

    Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author posting habits View only posts by author
    Posted - 2005.08.26 20:37:00 - [50]

    Edited by: Nomen Nescio on 26/08/2005 20:37:39
    So with no arguments from the tother side, we all agree that thorax fittgin with rails is as good as rupture then?

    Ok, so why would thorax need more drones then rupture? Argument about approach is totaly useless. I can say that rupture fitted with ac and thorax is with rails, and count how much damage i'll do with rails before rupture catches up.

    Once again

    • Rupture and thorax are good long range

    • Why thorax has more drones then rupture for close range?


    Nomen Nescio
    Nomen Nescio

    Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author posting habits View only posts by author
    Posted - 2005.08.27 04:18:00 - [51]

    Garreck

    You know what? You r right, Rupture is great ship, thorax is inline, its all ok.

    ArrowNow please, PLEASE write to devs about it, because for some reason they think that rupture mk2 should get 125 grid and 25 cpu bonus while rax gains nothing. But we all know that rupture is super good, good as thorax, so tell devs that any boost to rupture mk2 will be disbalance.

    Pretty please, with sugar on top.
    Nomen Nescio
    Nomen Nescio

    Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author posting habits View only posts by author
    Posted - 2005.08.27 04:18:00 - [52]

    Garreck

    You know what? You r right, Rupture is great ship, thorax is inline, its all ok.

    ArrowNow please, PLEASE write to devs about it, because for some reason they think that rupture mk2 should get 125 grid and 25 cpu bonus while rax gains nothing. But we all know that rupture is super good, good as thorax, so tell devs that any boost to rupture mk2 will be disbalance.

    Pretty please, with sugar on top.
    Nomen Nescio
    Nomen Nescio

    Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author posting habits View only posts by author
    Posted - 2005.08.29 18:14:00 - [53]

    Just for the record. You can't setup a cruser against heavy drones, mmmkey?

    Medium smartbomb takes forever to kill them. ECM burst is now not an option. And shooting 8 heavy drones with guns is a waste of damage because they have total HP like a thorax itself.
    Nomen Nescio
    Nomen Nescio

    Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author posting habits View only posts by author
    Posted - 2005.08.29 18:14:00 - [54]

    Just for the record. You can't setup a cruser against heavy drones, mmmkey?

    Medium smartbomb takes forever to kill them. ECM burst is now not an option. And shooting 8 heavy drones with guns is a waste of damage because they have total HP like a thorax itself.
    Nomen Nescio
    Nomen Nescio

    Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author posting habits View only posts by author
    Posted - 2005.08.29 20:14:00 - [55]

    And you dont forget that maller guns is practicaly = his guns. Maller 1600 plate is = his plate. But not only his drones do double damage, but also you suggest me to fire on the drones, which are in fact ~3.5k HP plus, so I fight rax + 1600 plate + another 1600 plate which orbits and shoots at me and rax pilot has double damage untill I shot down that extra 1600 plate flying around.

    Talking about balance yeh?

    PS
    A ceptor can kill a bs if both fitted in some specific way and situation is in favour of the ceptor. But its not the ground to say that bs = single ceptor.


    Nomen Nescio
    Nomen Nescio

    Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author posting habits View only posts by author
    Posted - 2005.08.29 20:14:00 - [56]

    And you dont forget that maller guns is practicaly = his guns. Maller 1600 plate is = his plate. But not only his drones do double damage, but also you suggest me to fire on the drones, which are in fact ~3.5k HP plus, so I fight rax + 1600 plate + another 1600 plate which orbits and shoots at me and rax pilot has double damage untill I shot down that extra 1600 plate flying around.

    Talking about balance yeh?

    PS
    A ceptor can kill a bs if both fitted in some specific way and situation is in favour of the ceptor. But its not the ground to say that bs = single ceptor.


    Nomen Nescio
    Nomen Nescio

    Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author posting habits View only posts by author
    Posted - 2005.09.03 22:36:00 - [57]

    Originally by: DigitalCommunist

    Wish that many people cared about removing instas :\


    We care (C)
    Nomen Nescio
    Nomen Nescio

    Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author posting habits View only posts by author
    Posted - 2005.09.03 22:36:00 - [58]

    Originally by: DigitalCommunist

    Wish that many people cared about removing instas :\


    We care (C)
    Nomen Nescio
    Nomen Nescio

    Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author posting habits View only posts by author
    Posted - 2005.09.03 22:36:00 - [59]

    Originally by: DigitalCommunist

    Wish that many people cared about removing instas :\


    We care (C)
       
     
    Copyright © 2006-2025, Chribba - OMG Labs. All Rights Reserved. - perf 0,77s, ref 20250623/0702
    EVE-Online™ and Eve imagery © CCP.

    bitcoin: 1CHRiBBArqpw5Yz7x5KS2RRtN5ubEn5gF

    COPYRIGHT NOTICE
    EVE Online, the EVE logo, EVE and all associated logos and designs are the intellectual property of CCP hf. All artwork, screenshots, characters, vehicles, storylines, world facts or other recognizable features of the intellectual property relating to these trademarks are likewise the intellectual property of CCP hf. EVE Online and the EVE logo are the registered trademarks of CCP hf. All rights are reserved worldwide. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. CCP hf. has granted permission to EVE-Search.com to use EVE Online and all associated logos and designs for promotional and information purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not in any way affiliated with, EVE-Search.com. CCP is in no way responsible for the content on or functioning of this website, nor can it be liable for any damage arising from the use of this website.